Federico
Buono
THE
DEPERSONALIZATION OF THE INDIVIDUAL
“The
crack on a line-margin”
(en inglés)
‘The
redemptive void
Takes
life away from those who dare
In
a dazzling recidivist excess
Of
a white and luminous death
Now
overhears
In
individual fatigue
That
Cerberus who watches over
At
the doors of your personal Inferno.’
From
‘the Fatigue’, Maurizio De mone
In
the cold and dark cells of redemption and systematic rehabilitation, one enters
an ostensive
world,
where perception is nullified on the threshold and in the margin, delineated by
the
parameters
of an impeding segregation.
The
non-belonging plunges the understanding of the acts like something receptive in
a prostrating
transience.
Transience
transfuses the emotional drives in search of a representative belonging.
Representation
dilutes the time of showing oneself and appearing under the guise of induced
subconcatenation
of
the relation producing depersonalization.
Is
the induction the relative form of representation?
We
come back to write about the act of induced subordination in coming to terms
like an Ipodeo:
And
we fix our nihilist research – in an egoist form – here experienced on the
line-margin of the
‘threshold’.
The
producing division establishes the criterion of anesthetization when passing
beyond the
‘threshold’:
While
settling itself, objective conscience indicates a splitting producing
non-belonging:
While
going over the threshold of the ‘penal institution’, the non-belonging emerges
with the
coming
to the surface of visualization and of the concatenation in a space-time
orientation:
The
link with existential living crumbles in the emerging of the vision of the ‘bars’
and in the act of
overstepping.
Overstepping
nods at the derivative time, which complies with the stabilization of the
imprisoned
body,
and the deconstruction composes the phases of the sequence of redemption and of
taking a
‘step
ahead’.
The
body becomes extraneous when the passing of the line-margin absent to the
character of the
constitutive
elements of one’s own level of relevance, with the line of the extremity in an
assumption
of dependence in making the ‘line’ one’s own limit in the margin of this limit.
The
border moves the perceptive assonance in non-realizing:
The
division in the correlative poses coexistence and co-presence in a margin of
deducible
assimilability.
In
establishing depersonalization, the condition of an imprisoned body accentuates
the singular
wasting,
in favour of sedentary settling of space-time parameters at the exterior of a
line that
coexists
in the margin of a co-presence.
The
affirmation of a sub-induced induction, in what apparent line is it in the
margin?
Extreme
vision delineates a survey of contraposition between non-appearance and the
belonging to
a
restructuration and in the sharing of the division between line and margin.
The
cognitive construct of overstepping shapes the structuring of the psyche in an articulation
of
transience,
with criteria of interdependence with the phases of a sequence and consequent
to the
modes
of the structure of compression and regression of the Individual.
‘The
exploration of space is the result of a long evolution, which the subject goes
through from a
lying
down position, then sitting down and finally standing up, and which allows him
to become
aware
of his surrounding environment, first by reptation and then by quadrupedalism (“forward
on
all
fours”), finally by walking: acquiring the march represents its fundamental
moment.’
‘Adaptation’
– ‘Psychomotor: 50 key words’, J. C. Coste
Moving
oneself ‘beyond’ breaks into a specular identity between an affirmation and the
similarity in
affirming
oneself as imprisoned body.
The
individual deconstruction adheres to the parameters of space-permanence in the
belonging of a
line
in the extreme of a margin.
The
constituted sub-inducing in acts of impeding repression disrupts the expression
of one’s own
existential
living.
The
feeling representing the Ego is marginalized while overstepping the threshold
of an extreme,
and
the margin restricts slowly and nullifies the radicalism of one’s experiences,
by breaking
existence
in a deprecating ‘tone’.
The
structural content deposes at the appearance of the composite delineation of
the line-margin.
The
understanding of the line in a margin is the representation of contiguity in
the prepared criterion
of
preparation in the recondite ravines of the redemptive cells.
The
logical structures of definition induce depersonalization in the act of
overstepping a
determination
of sub-inducing purposes and of critical abilities on emotional-intuitional
basis.
The
crack occurring when overstepping produces a discontinuous jumping of
depersonalization.
The
crack impresses total loss of belonging of one’s own being an individual and
makes the
adherence
to something more than an ‘imprisoned body’ fleeting.
In
a compromising siege in the delineation of a given event and in passing the ‘threshold’,
the
psycho-obtaining
leftover is in the balance, inside the alteration of the structures of
knowledge.
The
prepared guide that self-produces subordination predicts an axiomatic device of
link producing
relative-formal
contiguity in arranging the given event.
The
actuality of the event composes and decomposes the passage from the threshold
to the margin
in
a linear extreme.
The
experiential ‘definition’ is therefore compressed and strangled in an order in
the course and
overcoming
of the ‘threshold’:
The
threshold is the coexistence in a contemporary co-presence.
The
given summary chronicle the space-time deformation in the organic constitution
of a symptom
that
is necessary to the diagnosis:
The
body remains segregated in the remaining bottom of a redemptive cell.
In
this way, the formulation of representation makes the depersonalizing effect
concrete, in different
phases
according to the level of condition of being a ‘detained form’.
The
explanatory synthesis forms the individual on the ‘threshold’ and guarantees
the understanding
of
the transience of a given event, in an interpretative mode that exchanges the
given effect with the
actual
datum.
By
going through the threshold, the ‘language’ is the revelation of the definite
loss of one’s own
individuality.
Overstepping
marginalizes the producing effect and delineates the datum-form in establishing
understanding.
The
security in a cognitive existence is broken into countless imaginative
deformations.
The
immediate actual datum becomes a practical coming back to a replacement of the
datum-effect
producing
depersonalization.
The
drawing-up of deformations intervenes in anaesthetic roles in articulations of
relevancy with
the
forced-impeding structure.
Overcoming
the threshold minimizes the form and criterion of penetration of a compulsory
link in
marginalizing a given act.
‘The
word guilty introduced to indicate the one who – cum quo res agitum – indicates
any person
against
whom a judicial proceeding is directed: so in criminal proceedings it indicates
the one
against
which inquisition is directed, or accusation; and promiscuously it indicates at
times the one
who
is under investigation sometimes and the prosecution at other times. According to different
systems,
this shows clearly that in the juridical language, the word guilty has a quite
different
meaning
from that it has in common language.
The
guilty can be innocent, and it is a serious mistake made out of fatal
prevention, to dare
confound the common
meaning.’
‘On
the Guilty’, ‘Program of the course of criminal law’, F. Carrara.
A
given act disavows the trace of symbolic and impeding representation in
fractural discontinuity.
The
criterion of a compression of symbolizing effects poses – in the margin of
overstepping – the
assumption
of the principle of a hegemonic and induced-defined phenomenon in a regressing
grip:
The
actual elaboration of individual disruption introjects and expels the
form-guide somatising the
precluded one.
The
ejection of a formal datum in the act of definition ‘sign’ poses perspectives
of impeding course
inside the body-prisoner:
The
compression at the margins of a margin ejects in a continuous becoming the
presence-symptom
in
the disposition of an underwritten identification of the form-prisoner:
The
modifying alteration changes and annexes the progressive inoculating of
conformity to
imposed-impeding rules.
What
is it that poses the correlation individual in a crack on the line-margin?
The
cooptation schematizes the sign underlying the imprisoned body in a
deconstruction:
The
forced-precluding synapsis is the symptom transmitting the occlusion of an
individual.
The
condition of stimulating drive propagates the sublimation of intensity on the
threshold of an
extreme:
The
sequence of depersonalizing deformation expresses its decreasing contribution.
Is
the threshold is a margin determining depersonalization?
In
a reflex of intents at the limit of a limit, the linking of events poses
speculated responses where
the
form-prisoner does not move anything that is not a search for balance in a
concatenation of the
given
event:
The
threshold imposes and spreads a conditioned behavioural reflex, where the
concatenation
moves
around the extremity of the threshold-margin in a crack.
In
a Nihilist-egoist research, a question-non question is asked:
In
the cold and dark cell of redemption, is the remaining bottom the accomplished
crack on a linemargin?
‘In
general adaptation is defined as the ability that an organism has of keeping
itself alive and
develop
its potentialities in a given environment, as well as recording in a harmless
way the
variations
of this environment.
Adaptation
is therefore a function that prepares the subject to put into action its
psychic and motor
skills
in order to integrate itself in social-cultural reality, keeping itself there
and changing it.’
‘Adaptation’
– ‘Psychomotor: 50 key words’, J. C. Coste
http://325.nostate.net/?p=5903#more-5903
No hay comentarios.:
Publicar un comentario